mandag 20. oktober 2014

 Obama authorizes air surveillance of IS in Syria

I have been focusing on Obama and the situation in Syria. I read three articles about this and have been looking into what they think about Obama authorizing air surveillance of IS in Syria.  

The daily mail (UK)They refers to IS as "barbaric terrorists". Suddenly they are questioning Obama and his plan to stop IS. It seems like they do not believe that the US are doing everything in their power. They mention that the times named seven countries “likely enlisted”. Daily mail says that a trustful source from the State Department would not confirm that any country have been asked to provide help. In the article they wrote; Obama also branded IS “a cancer”, bragging that “tyrants and murderers before them should recognize that kind of hateful vision ultimately is no match for the strength and hopes of people who stand together for the security and dignity and freedom that is the birth right of every human being.” Daily mails comment on that was that “it was laid-on-thick rhetoric suggests either a confidence that a coalition will materialize, or a brazen acknowledgment that America will be left to bomb IS on its own in Syria.” 

The New York Times (USA)They focused a lot on America and the wellbeing of American citizen. They mention a lot what the people from the Withe House says. They are also focusing on how the attacks are happening, and what kind on weapons and plane they are using to bomb IS. The New York Times repeatedly writes that Obama does not want to help Syria’s strong-arm dictator Mr. Assad. The thing is that USA are very good at something called “cloak and dagger”. That is kind of like political nonsense, they say a lot and uses many words, but it really does not matter.

Aljazeera (Egypt)They had a very short article, while the others were long. Aljazeera is very straightforward and gives us the information we need. They do not quote anybody or say their opinion, they do not pick sides. So this article is just like the others, minus the “picking sides”-part.

If you are wondering who the IS are, follow this link and read a bit more--->  http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-29052144

Ingen kommentarer:

Legg inn en kommentar